Attention Word Slingers readers: Beginning December 11, 2019, all posts will be available at BaptistMessenger.com. Thank you for reading Word Slingers!
Al Mohler’s “The Briefing” podcast is back, after taking the
month of July off. The president of Southern Seminary has tackled some serious
cultural issues in these early days of August. For this week’s DHD I’ll
highlight some of Mohler’s commentary from The Briefing but also from a
fascinating article he wrote, mentioning one of my favorite political
commentators.
1. Mohler on
Religious Liberty
I start with Mohler’s article “Is
Religious Liberty Truly In Peril?” He addresses a published debate recently
provided by the Wall Street Journal.
The debate features law professor Marci Hamilton and David French, whom I greatly
appreciate.
Both French and Hamilton discuss the status of religious iberty
in our country. As Mohler describes, Hamilton depleting religious liberty as
merely “your individual, private thoughts,” which cease to be protected “once
those thoughts enter the public square.”
French points out that religious liberty has been in peril
for years, and Christian leaders have known about legal activists at all levels
of government who have been expanding “their regulatory and ideological attacks
on religious liberty.”
The most fascinating take on the exchange between French and
Hamilton involves the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) of 1993, which
was greatly supported by President Bill Clinton as well as other Democrat
leaders in Congress. Now, Hamilton states RFRA is legislating an “extreme” new
understanding of religious freedom.
Mohler’s commentary on this is excellent and should not be
missed:
“What changed in the last 25 years? The culture changed. The
culture that once honored religious liberty and respected it as a bedrock
freedom for civil society—that culture is no more. Religious liberty now
attracts the glare of the cultural left who see religious liberty as an
obstacle in the path of their social transformation. They view this freedom as
a socially-constructed institution of bigotry from which we must liberate
ourselves. Moreover, the rise of the LGBTQ movement now pits religious liberty
against the newly constructed sexual liberty—these are two, incompatible
freedoms that necessarily collide. The sexual revolution believes it’s time for
religious freedom to give way to its higher, newer, morally coercive ‘rights.’”
Mohler concluded his article giving warning about the
current Democratic presidential candidates who if any of them would get elected
will undoubtedly “dismantle religious liberty, with even greater hostility and
ferocity.”
2. Mohler on
California school curriculum
The next two topics baffle my mind. Check out Tuesday, Aug. 6 edition
of The Briefing and hear Mohler report on the State of California’s new
Ethnic Studies for high schools.
I’m actually impressed that Mohler was willing to read the
entire curriculum. His conclusion was this new Ethnic Studies that will be
taught in the highest populated state in America is “an absolute agenda for
transforming the United States of America into a very different country, a very
different culture.”
I’m also impressed on how well Mohler pronounced a few of
the original terms with rather unique spellings found in this curriculum.
Here’s my favorite takeaway from Mohler’s assessment of
California’s Ethnic Studies:
“We’re living in a post-modern world in which people can
come up with their own truth and demand that that truth be respected in almost
any circumstance, now even including spelling. The State Board there in
California is coming up with its new spellings requiring its new glossary. Why
would students not be able to do the very same thing?”
By the way, even the Los
Angeles Times found this new study to be ridiculous.
3. Mohler on personal
pronouns
Last Friday, Aug. 2,
Mohler addressed other recent unconventional approaches to the English
language. I’m not going to mention all that he covers because the grammar enthusiast
in me gets too aggravated when even thinking about it.
Mohler reports that a New
York Times columnist wants to do away with gendered singular personal
pronouns and only use “They” to modify both singular and plural nouns. I did
enjoy reading the explanation, even though I found it totally ridiculous.
“Our responsibility, according to the Christian worldview,
is to order our language so as most faithfully to correspond to the reality
that God has created,” Mohler said. “This is a moral responsibility. It’s a
theological responsibility. It’s also just a natural impulse because human
beings, made in the image of God, given the gift of consciousness, given the
gift of language, we desperately do want our language to make sense and to be
communicable, one to the other, understandable to those to whom we speak or
write or communicate. If our language, if our vocabulary becomes detached from
reality, it becomes not only less linguistically useful, it becomes subversive
of the very idea of communication.”
I will say this Briefing is one of Mohler’s all-time best.
I enjoyed reading the whole article, but here’s my favorite
part:
“If evangelicals heard their
moral angst over abortion clearly articulated in the media, I’m convinced
they’d be far less likely to consider journalists their enemies.”
Thanks Peggy! I hope your message doesn’t fall entirely on
deaf ears.
5. Importance of
asking questions
Another good, thought-provoking article I read this week is
by Helena Sorenson, “The
God Who Asks.”
I’m still mulling through some of the contents of Sorenson’s
article, but for the most part, I like how she presents God wanting to be
relational and His method of asking questions.
“Isn’t it fascinating that an
omniscient God, the God who knows us inside and out, should be so determined to
ask questions? Turn to any passage of Scripture, Old Testament or New, and there’s
a good chance you’ll catch Him in the act. In the Gospels, for example, Jesus
is always walking up to someone with an obvious malady, an obvious need, and
asking, “What do you want?” He makes no assumptions. Whatever information He’s
gained through observation or revelation, He never misses an opportunity to ask
a good question. Jesus honors the suffering people He encounters by allowing
them to voice their feelings and desires. In person. Face to face. He is
relentless in His pursuit of genuine relationship.”
6. God and weather
As I was trying to come up
with my final topic, I turned to what was a rather unexpected rain shower this
morning, which came right in the middle of a stretch of hot 100-degree days.
It made me think of Jerry Bridges’ book “Trusting God: Even When Life Hurts” and his chapter “God’s Power Over Nature.”
Here’s a challenging quote from
Bridges:
“Complaining about the
weather seems to be a favorite American pastime. Sadly, we Christians often get
caught up in this ungodly habit of our society. But when we complain about the
weather, we are actually complaining against God who sent us our weather. We
are, in fact, sinning against God (See Numbers 11:1). Not only do we sin
against God when we complain about the weather, we also deprive ourselves of
the peace that comes from recognizing our heavenly Father is in control of it.”
I read a peculiar article on the Christianity Today website. Titled “Are
We Morally Distressed By What Is Taking Place at the Border?” the article’s
author Sam Kim gives a rather intriguing comparison when writing his view about
those coming across the southern U.S. border.
Kim wrote, “(Evangelicals supporting) …funding for a wall is
the moral equivalent of those on the left who are advocating Planned
Parenthood. Both policies are catalysts for the loss of life that Scripture
commands us to protect. The unborn and those seeking asylum have an equal right
to life. What is the moral difference between killing and letting die, when the
ultimate outcome is the same?”
Speaking frankly, this comparison is too drastic and flawed.
There is enough support demonstrated at the border to disqualify his conclusion
of letting someone die who is near the border. It is possible to favor a border
wall AND offer care to those seeking asylum. There is no care of the unborn
when it comes to the abortion practices of Planned Parenthood.
I offer my own PP comparison involving Kim’s article. Just
like PP, the world’s largest abortion provider, never acknowledges the life of
the unborn baby, Kim never acknowledges the practices of exploitation of
children and families of the Cartels at the border.
I welcome Kim and others who share a similar view to read my
DHD
from last week, regarding the border crisis. Yes, the church should provide
care and support for those in need, especially those seeking asylum, under the
purpose of advancing the Gospel and furthering God’s Kingdom, but the
government should provide protection for citizens and maintain order. These
purposes of the church and the government can be practiced with no discord.
2. Swezey’s stand
A well-known broadcast leader in the Oklahoma City community
died earlier this week. Keith Swezey passed away on July 29 at the age of 67.
He is remembered by many in the broadcast journalism
business. I read many fond comments about Keith on Facebook. He also was
honored by news anchor Kerry Ogle on CBS affiliate KWTV News 9 in Ogle’s news
commentary “My 2 Cents.”
“A lot of broadcast
journalists have lost a mentor, but more than that Oklahoma lost a good man,”
Ogle said in his introduction.
Ogle also mentioned that
Keith stood “firm in his faith when given an ultimatum, knowing that it
would cost him his job as news director.”
To elaborate on what happened, in 1988, Keith was working at
WKY Radio when pari-mutuel gambling was on the rise with the addition of the
Remington Park horse track on the east side of Oklahoma City. WKY was given the
broadcast rights to cover the races and to promote the gambling wages at
Remington Park. As the news director, Keith was told by the station’s
management that he would be in charge of these reports. Keith refused to do
these duties, and WKY let him go.
The Baptist Messenger reported Keith’s departure at WKY in the June 30, 1988 edition.
Keith went on to teach at University of Central Oklahoma,
training broadcasting students. God bless Keith with the opportunity to
influence others.
I have known the Swezey family for years, as we are members
of the same church. I lift up Keith’s wife Dixie and his family during this
time of loss.
3. French on Harris
I got to be quick for the remainder of my topics.
Check out David French’s article,
responding to the Josh Harris’ fallout with Christianity. I was impressed to
see French share a powerful Gospel message on the National Review website.
“The indescribably good news is that from the moment of the
confession of faith, believers are not defined by their sin. They’re not
defined even by their own meager virtues. They’re defined by Christ,” French
wrote.
Please read the entire article and be blessed!
4. Born of water and
spirit
One of my favorite Bible passages in John 3, when Nicodemus
and Jesus meet. Don Carson wrote a great commentary on one of the most
challenging verses in the passage.
The last article I share tells an encouraging story about
Mack Bronson and Sammy Little, two Texas pastors who are a great example of
racial reconciliation
Oklahoma U.S. Senator James Lankford reported from the floor
of the Senate chambers this week about his recent trip to the U.S.-Mexico
border. I appreciate Sen. Lankford’s willingness to make this trek, and because
he is somebody I trust (in fact, there’s nobody in current politics I trust
more than James Lankford), I believe what he shared about the conditions of the
border, the facilities conditions and operations of the Customs and Border
Protection, as well as the operations of the cartels which involve child
exploitation.
Here is a video of Lankford’s floor speech, and for this
week’s edition of Doyle’s Half Dozen, I will give you my takeaways:
1. Lots of TV
watching and video games playing
I start my DHD with a light-hearted take. You’ll notice at different times during Lankford’s speech, he shows pictures of the children in border agents’ custody playing video games and watching television.
I don’t know why but I chuckled a little bit when Lankford
said, “You can see him playing a little Paw Patrol back at the station,”
referring to the three-year-old boy whom the agents found abandoned by human
smugglers.
I wouldn’t know for sure, but that may have been the first
time Paw Patrol has been mentioned from the U.S. Senate.
Later, Lankford shows a photo of young people in a detention
facility watching TV. “They’re sitting there watching actually Puss in Boots on
the TV,” Lankford said.
So Paw Patrol and Puss in Boots are both discussed in the congressional chambers of the U.S. Government. At least I can appreciate that dogs and cats are equally represented.
2. Roles of
government and church differ
On a more serious note, I would like my fellow evangelical Christian friends to understand the differences in the roles of the church and the government.
It is the role of the government to protect and support
citizens. We want a strong military and police force. We must be careful about
who comes to our country, especially when they take illegal measures, and
because the threat of terrorism is ever present. This is the priority of the
government, and everybody including evangelical Christians should value and
appreciate the government’s protection.
It is the role of the church, first and foremost, to advance the Gospel and further God’s Kingdom. In doing so, the church should be caring for those in distress or times of need (James 1:27) and showing hospitality to strangers (Heb. 13:2). There are many verses in Exodus, Leviticus and Deuteronomy about respecting and caring for “foreigners.”
In 2014, Russell Moore, president of the Southern Baptists’ Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, made this comment:
“The Gospel doesn’t fill in for us on the details on
how we can simultaneously balance border security and respect for human life in
this case. But the Gospel does tell us that our instinct ought to be one of
compassion toward those in need, not disgust or anger.
“The border crisis will take careful work by government
leaders. And it will take a church willing to pray and to love. Our answer to
the border crisis cannot be quick and easy. But, for the people of God, our
consciences must be informed by a Kingdom much more ancient and more permanent
than the United States.”
Again, Moore made this statement in 2014. Who was the U.S.
president in 2014? I’ll get to that in my next point.
Notice, though, the emphasis Moore made on balancing border
security and respect for human life. He said the border crisis, which even
existed five years ago, “will take careful work by government leaders.” He then emphasized the church separately,
saying the consciences of the people of God “must be informed by (God’s Kingdom).”
It is important for Christians to understand the differences
in the roles of the Church and the government when it comes to border security.
I welcome you to read a great commentary from former
executive director-treasurer of the Baptist General Convention of Oklahoma
Anthony Jordan.
In 2014, in his column titled “Our
primary effort,” Jordan emphatically explained the role of the church.
“We have declared our desire
to show compassion on everyone, whether legal or illegal,” he wrote. “Our
churches have not and do not stop people at the door and inquire as to their
legal status.”
He also said churches should
never violate the law in regard to immigrants.
Please note how different
both church and government should be when it comes to handling the border
crisis.
3. President Obama’s involvement
So, as I pointed out, the border crisis has existed well
before President Trump was in office. Lankford also mentioned this in his
speech, and he specifically calls out President Obama and his administration in
response to the recent blame given to Trump:
“You see, the famous ‘kids in cages’ facility that President
Trump has taken so much heat for is actually a facility in McAllen, Texas, they
call the central processing facility. It was stood up in 2014 and 2015 when
President Obama was facing a rush of children coming across the border with no
place to put them. And so President Obama’s team, Jeh Johnson as the Secretary
of DHS, built a facility in McAllen to be able to hold children there. That’s
the facility that President Trump is getting blamed for—President Obama and his
team actually designed and built. Now, is it a great facility for children? No.
I don’t think it is. Nor is it the fault of Border Patrol, though, that it’s a
bad facility. They’re using what they have to be able to manage the crisis
that’s happening in front of them. But I’m tired of hearing people say that
President Trump is trying to be able to throw all these kids out and treat them
so miserable when that is not the case.”
Yes, Senator, I’m tired of hearing it too.
I have said in previous DHDs I’m not an avid Trump
supporter. I even mentioned I did not vote for Trump in the previous election.
I left that portion of the ballot blank, offering an anti-vote. But I want people
to present the facts honestly.
If you are on a crusade on the border crisis and are blaming President Trump, why were you not shouting from your stump during the Obama years? It makes your actions appear more politically enticed.
4. Cartel’s
involvement
To those who genuinely have concern for those who are crossing the border illegally—seeing these people wanting asylum and desiring to live in America for a better life—your intentions are noble.
However, as Lankford pointed out, be aware of how the cartel
(criminal organization) is using people, especially young children, to cross
the border for their financial gain.
“Cartels are making millions
and millions of dollars exploiting children,” Lankford said. “They are
smuggling children and families across the border. If you’re an individual, a
single individual, it costs $8,000 now to be able to cross the border, and you
pay a toll to the cartels, both to the traffickers and smugglers that are
moving people, that $8,000, and then an additional fee to actually physically
cross the border at the time of the cartel’s choosing in that area. But if you
bring a child with you, it’s half price; it’s $4,000. The incentive now is: it
is cheaper to be able to cross this area if you bring a child because the
cartel knows, ‘I don’t have to sneak you over the wall. All I have to do is be
able to get you to the border and drop you off.’”
Lankford pointed out the cartel used to use 10-, 11-, 12-year-olds, but because these children are able to tell the border agents who they are, the cartel are now using three-year-olds.
Are there innocent people genuinely seeking asylum and a better life? Yes, but the business of the cartels has been happening since the 1980s, and they are playing the system while exploiting children and families for their financial gain. Please don’t discredit this and understand how difficult it can be to handle this border crisis.
5. False reporting
Lankford also debunked the
false accusations of the treatment of immigrants in the border facilities.
“One of the things that I’ve heard so many times is ‘these
kids can’t even brush their teeth because Americans are so mean and because the
Border Patrol are so ruthless to them.’ I went to five different facilities,
and every facility I asked to see their supply room,” Lankford said. He
mentioned he saw 87,000 toothbrushes as well as other hygiene products, along
with many snacks and supplies.
Lankford pointed out the border agents are personally paying
for clothing and other materials to provide for children.
“Are facilities overcrowded? Absolutely there are. The
people that struggle with that the most are actually members of the Border
Patrol because they have been exceptionally frustrated that they’re not getting
more support and more ability to be able to transition people out of their
facilities into actual detention facilities,” Lankford said.
6. ‘Go with the angel
every time’
I conclude with sharing Lankford’s closing comments:
“I will never forget last year sitting with a bipartisan
group of my colleagues, and as we discussed solutions to immigration, one of my
Democratic colleagues said out loud, ‘I haven’t decided what I want to do on
this yet. There’s an angel on one shoulder saying this problem needs to be
solved, and there’s a devil on my other shoulder saying, this is the greatest
political weapon I have against the President. Why would I give it up? And I
haven’t decided which way I’m going to go yet’. I looked at them and said, ‘Here’s
a basic rule of thumb I try to live by: when there’s an angel and a devil
talking to you, go with the angel every time.’ This is something we should do,
and we should stop playing political games and trying to hurt the President and
ignore the obvious solutions that we all should see. This is not a partisan
issue. This is a humanity issue. Let’s go solve it together.”
I am taking some time to do this week’s DHD while I’m
covering the MedAdvance Conference at Quail Springs Baptist Church in Oklahoma
City. I’ll give a report in one of my talking points.
1. Moon landing
communion
Tomorrow, July 20, will be the 50th anniversary
of the Apollo 11 mission landing on the moon. I was all of nine months when
this occurred, but it is a fascinating occurrence of man walking on the moon.
Joe Carter offers an excellent
explainer about a great observance by Buzz Aldrin who had communion
(Lord’s Supper) while on the moon.
A couple of takeaways from Carter’s article:
Aldrin was quoted in 1970: “One of the principal
symbols is that God reveals himself in the common elements of everyday life.”
The communion observance was kept low key in
order not to draw controversy, such as the lawsuit in response to the reading of
the Book of Genesis during the Apollo 8 mission.
The church that supported Aldrin commemorates the
moon communion service every year.
2. Mo. SBC-affiliated
university challenged
The Statement of Faith of Southwest Baptist University in
Bolivar, Mo. was reported by Baptist
Press to be under investigation by a peer assessment committee.
The reports seem positive, though SBU doctrinal position
“appeared to be ambiguous.”
This caught my eye due to the fact many institutions of
higher education that have Christian affiliations have appeared to veer away
from foundations of the faith, including Scriptural instruction.
I pray SBU responds properly and will stand strong in the
faith.
3. Planned Parenthood
leadership change
Something that flew under the radar this week is a rather
quick change in leadership with Planned Parenthood.
Baptist
Press reported Leana Wen has been removed as president of the world’s
largest abortion provider. You should check out this BP article because it
shares information that may not be found in other news sources.
BP reported that Wen was removed from her position “10 days
after she wrote for The Washington Post
about her miscarriage in June. She did not indicate any change of heart on
abortion when she said the experience has made her ‘commitment to women’s
health even stronger.’”
I also appreciate Abby Johnson’s comment of compassion for
Wen. A former Planned Parenthood clinic director, Johnson tweeted for “Pro-lifers”
to “to reach out to (Wen) in love. Let us also remember that she is a
woman grieving the loss of a miscarried child. Let us treat her with care, not
callousness.”
It is a shame Al Mohler is not giving Briefing reports in
July. I would be curious to know if he would have offered a take on this PP
leadership change.
4. Netflix cuts
suicide scene from ’13 Reasons Why’
Another BP story reported
this week that Netflix cut a graphic suicide scene from its streaming of the
series 13 Reasons Why.
Many organizations applauded the move by Netflix including
Parents Television Council (PTC) and American Council for Suicide Prevention
(ACSP).
“Netflix has finally
acknowledged the harmful impact that explicit content, such as the graphic
suicide scene in 13 Reasons Why is
capable of inflicting on children,” PTC said. “While we applaud
Netflix for making this responsible decision, we call on the company to
redouble its efforts to protect children from harmful content.”
“If the vulnerable
individual sees a fictional character struggling and then dying by
suicide,” AFSP said, “the vulnerable viewer can become more at risk
of imitating this suicidal behavior.”
I know many who have spoken
against this popular show. I pray this could only be the beginning of the
entertainment industry being held responsible for its productions and offering
better, constructive, life-encouraging content.
5. Thunder thoughts
People are wondering what are
my thoughts about the recent, drastic changes that have happened with the
Oklahoma City Thunder.
When the Paul George trade
happened I was floored, just like everybody else.
Since then, I’ve just been in
“wait-and-see” mode. I’ve had some various ideas on how the Thunder would
continue through this offseason, but I’m not going to hold my breath.
Obviously, though, it is apparent they are hitting the reset and basically
starting over.
Expectations are low, and
that’s OK. I’m never one to go major “gloom and doom” when it comes to the
Thunder. It means we have to look at the
Thunder a little differently this season.
The good news is, my second
favorite Thunder person is still in charge. Sam Presti fascinates me. His job
is hard, and it appears to have gotten harder, especially with many fans
spewing negative venom his way. However, I am confident that Sam is the man!
My first favorite Thunder person is no longer with the Thunder. I will miss my fist bump buddy, Russell Westbrook. It will be hard to see him playing for the Rockets, but I don’t have any ill feelings for him. Hopefully, when the Rockets come to town, he will make one more visit down the scorer’s table.
6. MedAdvance
Real quick, let me tell you
about this conference I am currently attending. MedAdvance is an International
Missions Board annual event, and it is making its first appearance in Oklahoma.
Many medical missionaries
from around the world are here to share their stories and to network with
others in the medical profession.
I’ll be doing a story for the
Baptist Messenger about MedAdvance, but the stories I hear and the camaraderie
and fellowship I have witnessed are encouraging.
Also, it has been reported
this is the largest attendance for MedAdvance. God is doing great work through
doctors, nurses and other medical professionals!
We just celebrated Independence Day. Americans everywhere
took time to enjoy the freedoms we have in our country, spent with family,
friends, food, fun and fireworks.
There were parades, observances of military appreciation,
patriotic musical performances and reflections of our nation’s history.
I enjoyed July 4 along with my fellow patriots.
Earlier this week, I heard a comment mentioning that America
was founded on slavery. It bothered me. I thought it was not accurate and could
lead to a misrepresentation of the founding of our country.
I decided to use this week’s Doyle’s Half Dozen to offer an
historical analysis as well as how best to respond when the topic of America
and the practice of slavery is discussed.
Gutekunst pointed out that many of the Founders were against
slavery. He quoted John Adams who said slavery was “a foul contagion in the
human character.” Benjamin Franklin said, “Slavery is… an atrocious debasement
of human nature.”
George Washington once was a slave owner, but he offered
them freedom. He also observed other actions to promote and offer freedom to
slaves, and he said, “There is not a man living who wishes more sincerely than
I do, to see a plan adopted for the abolition of it (slavery).” Later in life,
Washington said his biggest regret was that he and the other founders did not
abolish slavery once and for all.
And there are others who outright opposed or at least admitted
slavery was an inhumane practice.
2. Slavery was
progressively diminished
To reiterate, I am directly responding to the popular belief that America was founded on slavery. Consider the fact that slavery existed prior to the founding of the United States, especially in Europe. England, France, Spain and Portugal practiced slavery, as well as other countries.
I bring this up not to excuse early Americans but to clarify
the place slavery has in world history. I would speculate that the unfortunate popularity
of slavery across the globe caused insensitivity to even some who opposed
slavery, which hindered immediate action to abolish slavery entirely.
“Perhaps the best way to
describe the Founders is they accepted slavery as a matter of convenience,”
Gutekunst wrote. “They were trying to forge a coalition to fight the British,
and then they were trying to turn these former colonies into something
resembling a nation. They had to make negotiated compromises. They accepted
slavery because that’s what was needed to achieve a greater end.”
It is unfortunate that the
founders did not take a more aggressive approach, but their actions do not outright
support America being founded on slavery, rather a tolerance in order to become
a nation.
However, legislation did pass to discourage slavery. Eight
of the original 13 colonies outlawed slavery by 1776. The Northwest Ordinance
of 1787 made it illegal for slavery to be expanded in new territories. Congress
actually hindered slave states from having full representation in the federal
government.
As Gutekunst wrote, the Founders appeared to believe slavery would die out on its own. Even though this approach did not bring immediate success, it hardly supports the view of America being founded on slavery.
3. Cotton industry
hindered abolishment
Slavery began to increase after the cotton gin was invented
in 1793, 17 years after the U.S. was founded. This is where abolishment took a
wrong turn.
Those who hype up America being founded on slavery would
have its strongest argument at this point of history. For 87 years, slavery did
flourish in our country, and this is definitely a black mark on American
history.
4. Civil rights
leaders support founding documents
“Though arguments could be
made that the Founders made too many compromises, their overall project was to
set anti-slavery principles in place so that they could be enforced at some
point in the future,” wrote
Michael Sabo of The Heritage Foundation.
One of the bigger support aspects of the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution being anti-slavery is how historic civil rights leaders Frederick Douglas and Martin Luther King, Jr. praised the writing of both documents.
Douglas called the Constitution “a glorious liberty
document.” King said both the Declaration and the Constitution had “magnificent
words,” and in his famous “I Have a Dream” speech, he quoted the Constitution saying
everybody would have unalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of
happiness.
5. Be factual and
sensitive
As mentioned, it is shameful when reflecting on how slavery was practiced in America.
But from the evidence I presented, instead of thinking that
America was founded on slavery, consider how the founders promoted freedom and
not slavery, which eventually came to an end.
To those who hold strong feelings about the practice of
slavery being a part of American history and believe slavery is a founding
element of this country, I share your view that freedom is for all people. But
founding documents have also been used to gain freedom for all, proving the
Founders were instrumental in the end of slavery.
6. The greater
message
As a Christian, I know how great the Gospel message of Jesus
Christ is. The Gospel is reflected throughout the Bible. Many Bible characters
demonstrate what Jesus did once and for all, providing the ultimate freedom
from sin and death.
And the Gospel can be presented even when discussing the
Founders of America. I believe God intervened through the Founders—many were
professing Christians and many were not. The Founders fell short, even though
intentions to end slavery were good.
Just like God provided freedom to the Israelites from their
slavery in Egypt, He provided freedom to slaves in America.
And just like He can provide freedom from the physical
practice of slavery, God can provide freedom from sin to anyone who will
believe in Jesus Christ.
“But thanks be to God that though you
were slaves of sin, you became obedient from the heart to that form of
teaching to which you were committed, and having been freed from sin, you
became slaves of righteousness” (Rom. 6:17-18).